(Protocols) Photo Comparisons - Revision history

Darkwing at 15:15, 3 June 2023

2023-06-03T15:15:26Z

Darkwing at 15:09, 3 June 2023

2023-06-03T15:09:50Z

Darkwing at 15:04, 3 June 2023

2023-06-03T15:04:18Z

Darkwing: Darkwing moved page (Protocols) Photos to (Protocols) Photo Comparisons without leaving a redirect

2023-06-03T14:44:50Z

Darkwing moved page (Protocols) Photos to (Protocols) Photo Comparisons without leaving a redirect

Darkwing: Darkwing moved page Comparison Photos to (Protocols) Photos without leaving a redirect

2022-09-08T20:22:02Z

Darkwing moved page Comparison Photos to (Protocols) Photos without leaving a redirect

Darkwing: Created page with "(Courtesy of the Mid-America Bigfoot Research Center as part of their extensive listing of protocols.) When you post a picture that you think may contain a Bigfoot..."

2021-04-14T03:04:14Z

Created page with "(Courtesy of the Mid-America Bigfoot Research Center as part of their extensive listing of protocols.) When you post a picture that you think may contain a Bigfoot..."

New page

(Courtesy of the [[MABRC |Mid-America Bigfoot Research Center]] as part of their extensive listing of protocols.)

When you post a picture that you think may contain a Bigfoot in it, be prepared to be asked for comparison photos of the same location from different times. Too many people fall under the matrixing issue, believing that they have a Bigfoot, yet if they would take the time to review comparison pictures, they would either realize that they are seeing shadows or even leaves creating the impression of a face. If the same view is there a day later, then claiming it was a Bigfoot in the first place only erodes any credibility you hoped to of gained from the original picture. The [[MABRC]] requires any picture turned into them for evaluation to be accompanied by comparison photos, and other groups should always have that requirement too, for anything turned into them. You should never give anyone a free pass without the accompanying comparison photos to evaluate.

It is also [[MABRC]] policy to always ask for comparison photos whenever a photo is submitted to us for evaluation.

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 # Taken with the same camera or cell phone camera.
 # From the same exact spot the original photo was taken from, including the angle.
 # Under the exact lighting conditions, or near enough under the circumstances.
 # A form of measurement at the spot where you are claiming something was, the MABRC uses surveying measuring sticks.  (See photo below)
@@ Line 21: / Line 22: @@
 A surveying measuring stick that extends out to 8 feet tall, this can be purchased from [https://www.amazon.com/AdirPro-Fiberglass-Rectangular-Leveling-Rods/dp/B01FE52IGY Amazon] for about $83 and is definitely something any credible researcher will want to add to their investigation tools.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 3 June 2023
Line 19:		Line 19:
	# The measurements written down and submitted with the photos, to include, distance to the subject, height and width of the subject and the measurements of any items nearby that can be used to show the height and weight of the subject.		# The measurements written down and submitted with the photos, to include, distance to the subject, height and width of the subject and the measurements of any items nearby that can be used to show the height and weight of the subject.
	# Do not get mad or bent out of shape if others do not see what you see, you may be subjecting yourself to confirmation bias and believe wholeheartedly what you saw, but by giving the information listed above, it can be usually deduced as matrixing on your part. Nothing to get upset about, many old timer researchers have been there, done that themselves, it's all part of the learning process.		# Do not get mad or bent out of shape if others do not see what you see, you may be subjecting yourself to confirmation bias and believe wholeheartedly what you saw, but by giving the information listed above, it can be usually deduced as matrixing on your part. Nothing to get upset about, many old timer researchers have been there, done that themselves, it's all part of the learning process.
		+
		+	A surveying measuring stick that extends out to 8 feet tall, this can be purchased from [https://www.amazon.com/AdirPro-Fiberglass-Rectangular-Leveling-Rods/dp/B01FE52IGY Amazon] for about $83 and is definitely something any credible researcher will want to add to their investigation tools.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, 3 June 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:

	It is also [[MABRC]] policy to always ask for comparison photos whenever a photo is submitted to us for evaluation.		It is also [[MABRC]] policy to always ask for comparison photos whenever a photo is submitted to us for evaluation.
		+
		+	The following photo illustrates the need for comparison photos. The lady who sent this in, thought a Bigfoot was standing at the end of her driveway, and she took the photo. Upon on-site analysis and taking the comparison photos, it was discovered to be dark leaves in a brush pile that resembled a humanoid type figure.
		+
		+	[[File:1010341 10200271217763512 2043508756 n1.jpg\|1010341 10200271217763512 2043508756 n1]]
		+
		+	[[File:1118 comparison photo.jpg\|1118 comparison photo]]
		+
		+	Details for comparison photos:
		+
		+	# Taken with the same camera or cell phone camera.
		+	# From the same exact spot the original photo was taken from, including the angle.
		+	# Under the exact lighting conditions, or near enough under the circumstances.
		+	# A form of measurement at the spot where you are claiming something was, the MABRC uses surveying measuring sticks. (See photo below)
		+	# The measurements written down and submitted with the photos, to include, distance to the subject, height and width of the subject and the measurements of any items nearby that can be used to show the height and weight of the subject.
		+	# Do not get mad or bent out of shape if others do not see what you see, you may be subjecting yourself to confirmation bias and believe wholeheartedly what you saw, but by giving the information listed above, it can be usually deduced as matrixing on your part. Nothing to get upset about, many old timer researchers have been there, done that themselves, it's all part of the learning process.

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:44, 3 June 2023
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:22, 8 September 2022
(No difference)